Difference between revisions of "Modifying with Nouns"

From Sereer wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 21: Line 21:
 
ofiid orangu le
 
ofiid orangu le
 
'the white butterfly'
 
'the white butterfly'
  +
  +
These actually being nouns may also explain why the following is ruled out: *ofiid ole ran na. With na-modification, only adjectives can modify na, since na is a pronominal form.

Revision as of 14:40, 9 December 2012

Nouns can themselves modify nouns in syntactic patterns similar to those observed by certain adjectives.

 oɓii o safu suukar
 'sweet fruit (lit. sugar-tasting fruit)'
 ndawal safu kaane
 spicy meat (lit. hot-pepper-tasting meat)'
 xa degit xadaq xa ʃokolaat
 xa degit ʃokolaat xadaq
 'two pieces of chocolate / two chocolate pieces'
 otew oʄoola omosu oxe
 'the beautiful Jola girl'

In (1) and (2), the adjective is 'be tasting like' and the nouns are suukar 'sugar' and kaane 'hot pepper'. In the third and fourth examples, the noun is Jola person, which is used to describe the origins of the girl.

Arguably, as discussed in the section on Special Adjectives, adjectives like ran 'white' and ɓaal 'black' are in fact nouns. For this reason, they cannot themselves be used with the -u adjective suffix, but must be derived with a causative suffix to (i.e., caused whiteness, caused blackness).

*ofiid oranu le
 ofiid orangu le
 'the white butterfly'

These actually being nouns may also explain why the following is ruled out: *ofiid ole ran na. With na-modification, only adjectives can modify na, since na is a pronominal form.