Difference between revisions of "Noun Modification with na"
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | There is a common nominalizing strategy in Sereer involving the particle <i>na</i> and its distant past tense or perfect form <i>-iina</i>. This is used for predicate nominalization as well as relativization. (See the section on [[Relative Clauses]] for more details on the role of na</i> in relative constructions). |
+ | There is a common nominalizing strategy in Sereer involving the particle <i>na</i> and its distant past tense or perfect form <i>-iina</i>. This is used for predicate nominalization as well as relativization. (See the section on [[Relative Clauses]] for more details on the role of <i>na</i> in relative constructions). |
| − | In this type of modification, the noun and determiner form a constituent, the edge of which is subject to change in accordance with proximal/distal distinctions. That is, in (1) it’s <i> |
+ | In this type of modification, the noun and determiner form a constituent, the edge of which is subject to change in accordance with proximal/distal distinctions. That is, in (1) it’s <i>akoong ak<b>a</b></i> for distal and <i>akoong ak<b>e</b></i> for proximal determination (see section on [[Determiners and Demonstratives]] for more on proximity distinctions). |
(1) |
(1) |
||
| − | + | akoong <b>ala/ale</b> sadarnoox na akoong <b>aka/ake</b> sadarnoox na |
|
‘gorilla that is scary’ ‘gorillas that are scary’ |
‘gorilla that is scary’ ‘gorillas that are scary’ |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
The formation of complex modified noun phrases is identical to regular relativization: |
The formation of complex modified noun phrases is identical to regular relativization: |
||
| − | (4) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | people Det |
||
| − | ‘the one who went and saw’ |
||
| + | <gl id="ex4" fontsize=12> |
||
| − | wiin wa ndet na wa ngat na |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | people Det went Rel saw Rel |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | </gl> |
||
Multiple na-nominalizations can layer in modifying the same noun: |
Multiple na-nominalizations can layer in modifying the same noun: |
||
| + | <gl id="ex5" fontsize=12> |
||
| − | + | \gll xa- biy xa- ɗak axa mbel na mbodax na |
|
| ⚫ | |||
| + | pl-Cl fruit pl-Cl two Det-dist good Rel sour Rel |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | </gl> |
||
| − | An intermediate determiner is optional between the two predicate nominalizations. However, this does not vary according to noun class but is always w- (for plural) and x- (for singular), the vowel in which indicates a proximal/distal distinction (-a being distal and -e proximal). The x-/w- determiner is a universal determiner, and not one that is noun-class specific. We encounter this in other contexts in which the noun class of the noun not deducible, such as in headless relative clauses. (This universal demonstrative is introduced in the section on [[Determiners and Demonstratives]]). |
+ | An interesting point is to be made about the nominal status of the relativizing pronoun na. As (6) and (7) show, an intermediate determiner is optional between the two predicate nominalizations. However, this does not vary according to noun class but is always w- (for plural) and x- (for singular), the vowel in which indicates a proximal/distal distinction (-a being distal and -e proximal). The x-/w- determiner is a universal determiner, and not one that is noun-class specific. We encounter this in other contexts in which the noun class of the noun not deducible, such as in headless relative clauses. (This universal demonstrative is introduced in the section on [[Determiners and Demonstratives]]). |
| + | <gl id="ex6" fontsize=12> |
||
| − | + | \gll o- biy o- leng ola/ole fel na <b>xa/xe</b> fodax na |
|
| ⚫ | |||
| + | sg-Cl fruit sg-Cl one Det good Rel Det sour Rel |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | </gl> |
||
| + | <gl id="ex7" fontsize=12> |
||
| − | + | \gll xa- biy xa- ɗak axa/axe mbel na <b>wa/xe</b> mbodax na |
|
| ⚫ | |||
| + | pl-Cl fruit pl-Cl two Det good Rel Det sour Rel |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | </gl> |
||
This suggests that na is a pronominal form that can take a determiner, and when it does, it takes a noun-class-indeterminate one (<i>~ na xe, ~ na we</i>). The section on [[Determiners and Demonstratives]] discusses in depth the nature of these general determiners. |
This suggests that na is a pronominal form that can take a determiner, and when it does, it takes a noun-class-indeterminate one (<i>~ na xe, ~ na we</i>). The section on [[Determiners and Demonstratives]] discusses in depth the nature of these general determiners. |
||
| Line 46: | Line 54: | ||
Go back to: [[Modification Strategies]] |
Go back to: [[Modification Strategies]] |
||
| − | [[User:Oana|Oana]] |
+ | --[[User:Oana|Oana]] 05:56, 17 May 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 22:56, 16 May 2013
There is a common nominalizing strategy in Sereer involving the particle na and its distant past tense or perfect form -iina. This is used for predicate nominalization as well as relativization. (See the section on Relative Clauses for more details on the role of na in relative constructions).
In this type of modification, the noun and determiner form a constituent, the edge of which is subject to change in accordance with proximal/distal distinctions. That is, in (1) it’s akoong aka for distal and akoong ake for proximal determination (see section on Determiners and Demonstratives for more on proximity distinctions).
(1)
akoong ala/ale sadarnoox na akoong aka/ake sadarnoox na ‘gorilla that is scary’ ‘gorillas that are scary’
(2)
japil fa/fe wel na japil ka/ke mbel na ‘knife that is sharp’ ‘knives that are sharp’
(3)
otew oxa/oxe sadarnoox na rew wa/we sadarnoox na ‘woman that is scary’ ‘women that are scary’
The formation of complex modified noun phrases is identical to regular relativization:
<gl id="ex4" fontsize=12> \gll wiin wa ndet na ngat na people Det went Rel saw Rel \trans the one who went and saw </gl>
Multiple na-nominalizations can layer in modifying the same noun:
<gl id="ex5" fontsize=12> \gll xa- biy xa- ɗak axa mbel na mbodax na pl-Cl fruit pl-Cl two Det-dist good Rel sour Rel \trans the two fruits that are delicious that are sour </gl>
An interesting point is to be made about the nominal status of the relativizing pronoun na. As (6) and (7) show, an intermediate determiner is optional between the two predicate nominalizations. However, this does not vary according to noun class but is always w- (for plural) and x- (for singular), the vowel in which indicates a proximal/distal distinction (-a being distal and -e proximal). The x-/w- determiner is a universal determiner, and not one that is noun-class specific. We encounter this in other contexts in which the noun class of the noun not deducible, such as in headless relative clauses. (This universal demonstrative is introduced in the section on Determiners and Demonstratives).
<gl id="ex6" fontsize=12> \gll o- biy o- leng ola/ole fel na xa/xe fodax na sg-Cl fruit sg-Cl one Det good Rel Det sour Rel \trans the one fruit that is delicious that is sour </gl>
<gl id="ex7" fontsize=12> \gll xa- biy xa- ɗak axa/axe mbel na wa/xe mbodax na pl-Cl fruit pl-Cl two Det good Rel Det sour Rel \trans the two fruit that are delicious that are sour </gl>
This suggests that na is a pronominal form that can take a determiner, and when it does, it takes a noun-class-indeterminate one (~ na xe, ~ na we). The section on Determiners and Demonstratives discusses in depth the nature of these general determiners.
In perfect and distant past tense forms, the na pronoun takes the allomorph shape -'iina (with a glottal stop):
wiin wa magin 'iina 'the people were big'
Go back to: Modification Strategies
--Oana 05:56, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
