Difference between revisions of "Possessives with Adjectives"

From Sereer wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 20: Line 20:
   
   
The possessive clitic can even occur on multiple of the modifiers:
+
The possessive clitic can even occur on multiple of the modifiers, as well as to the noun itself:
   
 
fañiik <b>es</b> fambarʄu famaak <b>es</b> fe ‘the my ugly big elephant’
 
fañiik <b>es</b> fambarʄu famaak <b>es</b> fe ‘the my ugly big elephant’
Line 31: Line 31:
   
 
pañiik <b>es</b> parʄu maak saƭku <b>es</b> ke ‘the my ugly big strong elephants’
 
pañiik <b>es</b> parʄu maak saƭku <b>es</b> ke ‘the my ugly big strong elephants’
  +
 
xa nafad es xa lakas es axe ‘the my other shoes’
   
 
When this happens, in some word-final phonological environment there is contraction of the possessive clitic:
 
When this happens, in some word-final phonological environment there is contraction of the possessive clitic:
Line 43: Line 45:
 
*fidel sumes fe
 
*fidel sumes fe
   
  +
It is unclear to how many modifiers the possessive can attach before it stops being odd or unacceptable to the speaker. A threshold test definitely shows that a possessive on ALL modifiers is unacceptable, but any combination more than just two is not as clearly unacceptable:
Interestingly, the possessive morpheme can attach to multiple of the modifiers and to the noun itself:
 
 
xa nafad es xa lakas es axe ‘the my other shoes’
 
 
rew es daduk es xoju mosu we ‘the thin beautiful women’
 
rew daduk es xoju mosu es we
 
?rew es daduk es xoju es mosu we
 
#rew es daduk es xoju es mosu es we
 
   
 
rew es daduk es xoju mosu we ‘the thin beautiful women’
It is unclear what the maximum threshold for repeated clitic attachment is, but the consultant confirms that a clitic on ever element in the phrase is not acceptable.
 
 
rew daduk es xoju mosu es we
 
?rew es daduk es xoju es mosu we
 
#rew es daduk es xoju es mosu es we

Revision as of 16:43, 9 December 2012

Possessive pronoun clitics can attach to any of the words in a string of noun-modifications.

 wiin es faaxu we		        ‘the my good people’
 wiin faaxu es we
 rew es daduk xoju mosu we	        ‘the two thin beautiful women’
 rew daduk es xoju mosu we
 rew daduk xoju es mosu we	
 rew daduk xoju mosu es we
 ataaya fa ñaayu es fe			‘the my spicy tea’		
 ataaya es fa ñaayu fe				
 ataaya es ñyaayu ke			‘the my spicy teas’
 ataaya ñyaayu es ke
 fañiik fambarʄu fe			        ‘the ugly elephant’
 fañiik es fambarʄu fe		        ‘the my ugly elephant’
 fañiik fambarʄu es fe


The possessive clitic can even occur on multiple of the modifiers, as well as to the noun itself:

 fañiik es fambarʄu famaak es fe	‘the my ugly big elephant’		
 fañiik fambarʄu es famaak fe			
 fañiik fambarʄu famaak es fe			
 pañiik es parʄu maak ke 		‘the my ugly big elephants’
 pañiik parʄu es maak ke
 pañiik parʄu maak es ke						
 pañiik es parʄu maak saƭku es ke	‘the my ugly big strong elephants’
 xa nafad es xa lakas es axe			‘the my other shoes’

When this happens, in some word-final phonological environment there is contraction of the possessive clitic:

 ojafes oɗomu le				‘the my painful leg’
 ojaf odomes ole 
 ojaf odoms ole

There are some modifiers for which the possessor clitic attachment cannot occur:

 fideles sumu fe				‘the my hot fire’
 *fidel sumes fe

It is unclear to how many modifiers the possessive can attach before it stops being odd or unacceptable to the speaker. A threshold test definitely shows that a possessive on ALL modifiers is unacceptable, but any combination more than just two is not as clearly unacceptable:

 rew es daduk es xoju mosu we		‘the thin beautiful women’
 rew daduk es xoju mosu es we
 ?rew es daduk es xoju es mosu we
 #rew es daduk es xoju es mosu es we