Difference between revisions of "Imperatives and Hortatives"

From Sereer wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
'''bar''' + '''o/nu''' + V stem
 
'''bar''' + '''o/nu''' + V stem
   
e.g. bar o ret! "don't go (sg)!", bar nu ndet! "don't go (pl)!" (103). This can be contracted to ba + V stem on occasion, e.g. ba ret! "don't go (sg)!", ba ndet! "don't go (pl)!" (103)
+
e.g. bar o ret! "don't go (sg)!", bar nu ndet! "don't go (pl)!" (103). This can be contracted to ba + V stem on occasion, e.g. ba ret! "don't go (sg)!", ba ndet! "don't go (pl)!" (103). '''bar''' can perhaps be analyzed as a free prohibitive morpheme; it is not clear if it can be used on its own as an utterance as can hortative '''aca''' (see below).
   
 
===Hortatives===
 
===Hortatives===

Revision as of 15:18, 31 October 2012

Imperatives

Imperatives for singular listeners are formed with a suffix -i, e.g. geenoox-i "stand up!" (079).

Imperatives for plural listeners are formed with a suffix -yo', e.g. jaw-yo'! "cook (pl)!" (103). It is unclear whether this is analyzable as a combination of the imperative morpheme -i and the plural marker -yo'.

A negative imperative (prohibitive?) is formed as follows:

bar + o/nu + V stem

e.g. bar o ret! "don't go (sg)!", bar nu ndet! "don't go (pl)!" (103). This can be contracted to ba + V stem on occasion, e.g. ba ret! "don't go (sg)!", ba ndet! "don't go (pl)!" (103). bar can perhaps be analyzed as a free prohibitive morpheme; it is not clear if it can be used on its own as an utterance as can hortative aca (see below).

Hortatives

Hortatives, at least for 1PL subjects, are expressed by way of the following:

aca + i + V stem

e.g. aca i ndet! "let's go!" (103). aca can perhaps be analyzed as a free-standing hortative particle; it can be used on its own as an utterance meaning roughly "let's!".