Difference between revisions of "Imperatives and Hortatives"

From Sereer wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
===Imperatives===
 
===Imperatives===
  +
  +
====(Positive) Imperatives====
   
 
Imperatives for singular listeners are formed with a suffix -i and (if the focus of the command is plural) a plural marker -o':
 
Imperatives for singular listeners are formed with a suffix -i and (if the focus of the command is plural) a plural marker -o':
Line 8: Line 10:
   
 
The plural imperative appears to surface with a suffix -yo', e.g. jaw-yo'! "cook (pl)!" (103). I analyze this here as a combination of the imperative morpheme -i and the plural marker -yo' seen elsewhere on verbs.
 
The plural imperative appears to surface with a suffix -yo', e.g. jaw-yo'! "cook (pl)!" (103). I analyze this here as a combination of the imperative morpheme -i and the plural marker -yo' seen elsewhere on verbs.
  +
  +
====Prohibitives====
   
 
A negative imperative (prohibitive?) is formed as follows:
 
A negative imperative (prohibitive?) is formed as follows:
Line 14: Line 18:
   
 
e.g. bar o ret! "don't go (sg)!", bar nu ndet! "don't go (pl)!" (103). This can be contracted to ba + V stem on occasion, e.g. ba ret! "don't go (sg)!", ba ndet! "don't go (pl)!" (103). '''bar''' can perhaps be analyzed as a free prohibitive morpheme; it is not clear if it can be used on its own as an utterance as can hortative '''aca''' (see below).
 
e.g. bar o ret! "don't go (sg)!", bar nu ndet! "don't go (pl)!" (103). This can be contracted to ba + V stem on occasion, e.g. ba ret! "don't go (sg)!", ba ndet! "don't go (pl)!" (103). '''bar''' can perhaps be analyzed as a free prohibitive morpheme; it is not clear if it can be used on its own as an utterance as can hortative '''aca''' (see below).
  +
  +
====Inflectional Paradigms====
   
 
Inflectional endings for 2S and 2P performing actions on various objects, e.g. '''jaw-anam''' 'cook for me (sg)!'. These and other inflectional endings have yet to be completely investigated for the imperative and the prohibitive.
 
Inflectional endings for 2S and 2P performing actions on various objects, e.g. '''jaw-anam''' 'cook for me (sg)!'. These and other inflectional endings have yet to be completely investigated for the imperative and the prohibitive.

Revision as of 11:46, 13 November 2012

Imperatives

(Positive) Imperatives

Imperatives for singular listeners are formed with a suffix -i and (if the focus of the command is plural) a plural marker -o':

V stem + -i (+ -o')

e.g. inoox-i genoox "stand up!" (079).

The plural imperative appears to surface with a suffix -yo', e.g. jaw-yo'! "cook (pl)!" (103). I analyze this here as a combination of the imperative morpheme -i and the plural marker -yo' seen elsewhere on verbs.

Prohibitives

A negative imperative (prohibitive?) is formed as follows:

bar + o/nu + V stem

e.g. bar o ret! "don't go (sg)!", bar nu ndet! "don't go (pl)!" (103). This can be contracted to ba + V stem on occasion, e.g. ba ret! "don't go (sg)!", ba ndet! "don't go (pl)!" (103). bar can perhaps be analyzed as a free prohibitive morpheme; it is not clear if it can be used on its own as an utterance as can hortative aca (see below).

Inflectional Paradigms

Inflectional endings for 2S and 2P performing actions on various objects, e.g. jaw-anam 'cook for me (sg)!'. These and other inflectional endings have yet to be completely investigated for the imperative and the prohibitive.

Hortatives

Hortatives, at least for 1PL subjects, are expressed by way of the following:

(aca) + i + V stem + (zero ending)

e.g. (aca) i ndet! "let's go!" (103). aca could perhaps be analyzed as a free-standing hortative particle, but it can also be used on its own as an utterance meaning roughly "let's!", or with the imperative or prohibitive moods to add urgency to the request.