Difference between revisions of "Derivational Verbal Morphology"
From Sereer wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 6: | Line 6: | ||
* -in, a suffix that could be called applicative, transitivizing, or something like that (e.g. gɛf "to break, explode (intr.)" --> gɛfin "break it", translation unclear) |
* -in, a suffix that could be called applicative, transitivizing, or something like that (e.g. gɛf "to break, explode (intr.)" --> gɛfin "break it", translation unclear) |
||
* -ooχ, of unclear meaning (examples needed) |
* -ooχ, of unclear meaning (examples needed) |
||
+ | |||
+ | == Verb pairs demonstrating derivation == |
||
+ | |||
+ | {| class="wikitable sortable" |
||
+ | ! Suffix involved !! Unsuffixed !! Gloss !! Suffixed !! Gloss !! Session !! notes ! |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | | A || B || C || D || E || F || G |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | |} |
Revision as of 02:56, 7 October 2012
Sereer seems to have at least some verbal derivational morphology. So far, we've seen:
- -uʔ / -oʔ, a suffix that takes a stative verb and turns it into an adjective (e.g. saɗik "to be strong, tough" -> saɗkuʔ "strong, tough"; maj "to be many" -> majuʔ "many")
- -ir, a suffix that makes instrument-type nouns from verb stems (e.g. βɛʄ "to swim" --> bɛʄir "thing used to swim")
- -ir, a suffix that might be reciprocal (?) (e.g. χas "to scold, berate" --> χasir "to argue")
- -in, a suffix that could be called applicative, transitivizing, or something like that (e.g. gɛf "to break, explode (intr.)" --> gɛfin "break it", translation unclear)
- -ooχ, of unclear meaning (examples needed)
Verb pairs demonstrating derivation
Suffix involved | Unsuffixed | Gloss | Suffixed | Gloss | Session | notes ! |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | F | G |