Difference between revisions of "Derivational Verbal Morphology"

From Sereer wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
* -in, a suffix that could be called applicative, transitivizing, or something like that (e.g. gɛf "to break, explode (intr.)" --> gɛfin "break it", translation unclear)
 
* -in, a suffix that could be called applicative, transitivizing, or something like that (e.g. gɛf "to break, explode (intr.)" --> gɛfin "break it", translation unclear)
 
* -ooχ, of unclear meaning (examples needed)
 
* -ooχ, of unclear meaning (examples needed)
  +
  +
== Verb pairs demonstrating derivation ==
  +
  +
{| class="wikitable sortable"
  +
! Suffix involved !! Unsuffixed !! Gloss !! Suffixed !! Gloss !! Session !! notes !
  +
|-
  +
| A || B || C || D || E || F || G
  +
|-
  +
|}

Revision as of 03:56, 7 October 2012

Sereer seems to have at least some verbal derivational morphology. So far, we've seen:

  • -uʔ / -oʔ, a suffix that takes a stative verb and turns it into an adjective (e.g. saɗik "to be strong, tough" -> saɗkuʔ "strong, tough"; maj "to be many" -> majuʔ "many")
  • -ir, a suffix that makes instrument-type nouns from verb stems (e.g. βɛʄ "to swim" --> bɛʄir "thing used to swim")
  • -ir, a suffix that might be reciprocal (?) (e.g. χas "to scold, berate" --> χasir "to argue")
  • -in, a suffix that could be called applicative, transitivizing, or something like that (e.g. gɛf "to break, explode (intr.)" --> gɛfin "break it", translation unclear)
  • -ooχ, of unclear meaning (examples needed)

Verb pairs demonstrating derivation

Suffix involved Unsuffixed Gloss Suffixed Gloss Session notes !
A B C D E F G